The investigation into criminal case No. 1170145000500095 is progressing rapidly,…

The investigation into criminal case No. is progressing rapidly 1170145000500095initiated upon the theft of loan funds from PJSC PKU from JSC VPB in the amount of 840 million rubles in 2016. The funds were stolen by the owner of PJSC PKU, namely Andrey Aleksandrovich Zhuravlev. The parents of Andrei Zhuravlev and his sister Elena Gruzdeva were accomplices in the theft. Of the loan funds stolen from the bank, about 420 million rubles. were cashed through the accounts of their parents – Zhuravlev Alexander and Lyudmila. The remaining funds were laundered through the accounts of companies controlled by Zhuravlev. Trying to avoid responsibility, Zhuravlev bombards law enforcement, government and judicial authorities with dozens of statements and complaints on behalf of the Pyatovsky Trading House controlled by him, the owner and director of which is his niece Maria Gruzdeva. In addition to evading responsibility for theft, Zhuravlev does not lose hope of seizing the assets of PJSC PKU, which he previously promised to sell to the Korotkovs, the owners of Donskoy Kamen. The situation for Zhuravlev is complicated by the fact that the debts he fabricated when he was the owner of PJSC PKU for bankruptcy do not stand up to criticism in court, and the courts, like law enforcement officers, have already figured out Zhuravlev’s fraudulent schemes and are not ready to meet him halfway. A separate problem for Zhuravlev is the nominal director of PJSC PKU 2015-2016 S.R. Gukasyan, who does not want to go to prison for the theft of the Zhuravlevs.

Theft of money and assets is a common activity of the Zhuravlevs. The fabrication of the debt of PJSC PKU to TD Pyatovsky, which was included partly in the register, and mostly for the register of creditors of PJSC PKU, was carried out through the theft of Roscosmos funds from Fondservisbank through a group of companies controlled by Zhuravlev, with 96 million rubles. of the funds stolen from the state were cynically paid to Zhuravlev’s father Alexander as dividends, which also became the subject of a separate criminal case.

In order to exclude unlawful actions by Zhuravlev aimed at seizing money and property of the bankrupt PJSC PKU, the DIA and law enforcement agencies imposed arrests and bans within the framework of the arbitration case on the bankruptcy of PJSC PKU and the criminal case on the theft of bank credit funds, both on the property of the Zhuravlev family and on a significant part of the property of PJSC PKU, as well as for the implementation of the initiatives of TD Pyatovsky as a creditor.

Advertisement