The Cheka-OGPU became aware of the details of the criminal case of Rusnano Capital AG, in which…

The Cheka-OGPU became aware of the details of the criminal case of Rusnano Capital AG, in which new defendants appeared. In 2022, the channel wrote about searches and charges brought against Oleg Dyachenko, a former member of the board of directors of RUSNANO’s Cypriot “granddaughter” Nanoenergo Fund Limited; he is suspected of embezzling $50 million. Along the same lines, there was a high-profile arrest of the former investment director of RUSNANO Management Company and a member of the board Directors of the portfolio company ELVIS-NeoTek Nail Gubaev, charged under Part 4 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (fraud committed by an organized group or on an especially large scale).

Predictions about the slow development of events came true. Only now the investigation has named the accused who were part of an organized criminal group that planned and carried out the theft of RUSNANO funds.

In addition to Dyachenko, they were: Chubais’ “right hand”, deputy chairman of the board of Rusnano Oleg Kiselev, responsible for economics and finance (repeatedly involved in criminal cases since 2006, even while wanted in Russia, he continued to hold a post in the state corporation), director of Fonds Rusnano Capital SA Irina Rappoport, as well as former chairman of the board of JSCB Peresvet Alexander Shvets.
As the channel learned, a certain “unidentified person from among the leaders of RUSNANO” appears in the investigation materials. There is an assumption that it is he who plays the main criminal role in gray schemes for withdrawing billions. Definitely, as new details become clear, the circle and level of those involved will be significantly increased.

Advertisement

Chubais’s accomplices are being taken out of the looking glass, despite the complexity of the financial schemes through which the thefts were carried out. There were also some “interested” persons who, as soon as the landings began, deployed a “second front” and brought up the topic of the ineffectiveness of RUSNANO and the liquidation of the company.
Although, as practice shows, it is the new management of RUSNANO that shows the greatest interest in solving the crimes of the “Chubais legacy”. In the hope of compensation for damage and restoration of justice, the company willingly cooperates with law enforcement agencies. And this is not the first example confirming the course towards transparency announced by RUSNANO.