Yesterday in the Nikulinsky District Court of Moscow the final hearing of…

Yesterday, in the Nikulinsky District Court of Moscow, the final hearing was held to consider the civil case on the claim of the Prosecutor General’s Office against the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “ATEKS” of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation, which is in the process of bankruptcy and has claims from creditors for the seizure of movable and immovable property for state income. Participants in a high-profile criminal case on the theft of funds during the construction of the residence of the President of the Russian Federation “Novo-Ogaryovo” were brought in as co-defendants – former heads of FSUE ATEKS Andrei Kaminov and Stanislav Kuner, as well as the ex-head of HC Forum Dmitry Mikhalchenko. The third party is the FSO of the Russian Federation, whose interests in this process are represented by an odious figure – senior legal adviser of the Legal Department of the FSO, Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Kolodin. The statement of claim was filed on 02/04/2022 and, using the electronic distribution method, was submitted to the federal judge of the Nikulinsky Court, Aigul Shaikhutdinova. The essence of the claim is that the former leaders of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “ATEX” Kaminov with Kuner and businessman Dmitry Mikhalchenko illegally used property that was at one time transferred from the introduction of the Operational Directorate of the FSO to the disposal of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “ATEX” for conducting business activities and generating income. The Prosecutor General’s Office believes that a large facility at 45 Novoslobodskaya Street was illegally leased to a company, according to the Prosecutor General’s Office, affiliated with the structures of Dmitry Mikhalchenko. After four court hearings, where the main argument of the Prosecutor General’s Office in the corruption connection between Kaminov and Mikhalchenko was the high-profile decision of the Nikulinsky court on the nationalization of the port of Bronka, in which Kaminov and Mikhalchenko were accused of corruption connections. Presiding judge Shaikhutdinova, having listened to all the arguments of the parties, at the end of the fourth meeting convincingly recommended that representatives of the Prosecutor General’s Office and the Federal Security Service repel the objections of representatives Mikhalchenko and Kaminov by providing facts and supporting documents, and not waving a decision on Bronka. The Prosecutor General’s Office tried to use the Bronka decision as a prejudice in proving its case. Imagine the surprise of lawyers Mikhalchenko and Kaminov when, at the next meeting, Judge Kuznetsova, who had previously presided over civil trials for compensation of damages from the FSO to pre-trial defendants from the criminal case on Novo-Ogarevo and the nationalization of the port of Bronka in the Leningrad Region, entered the courtroom instead of Judge Shaikhutdinova. where among the defendants were Kuehner, Kaminov and Mikhalchenko. Representatives of Mikhalchenko and Kaminov challenged Judge Kuznetsova, guided not only by common sense, but also by the norms of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, considering that the judge who had previously considered cases and made a judgment against Kaminov, Kuehner and Mikhalchenko cannot consider this case, since she had already formed an opinion on the defendants, set out in her decision. After listening to the arguments of representatives Kaminov and Mikhalchenko about their recusal, the Prosecutor General’s Office and the FSO were categorically against the judge’s recusal, without giving any reasons, they refused the defendants’ request. In fact, Judge Kuznetsova, while hearing the position of the Prosecutor General’s Office and the FSO, listened to the reading of her own decision on the port of Bronka. Judge Kuznetsova needed only two meetings to study the case materials, hear the positions of the parties and make a decision, with which she fully satisfied the claims of the Prosecutor General’s Office. Satisfying the claims of the Prosecutor General’s Office threatens the defendants Kaminov, Kyuner and Mikhalchenko with being brought to subsidiary liability for the debts of FSUE ATEKS.
https://t.me/vchkogpu/27861?single