We talk about the essence of the trial during which Judge Daniil’s hand …

We talk about the essence of the trial, during which the judge Daniil Rukavishnikov, by his own admission, “goats” of the defendant – pensioner Yevgeny Sukhorukova. A disabled pensioner Sukhorukov, suffering from cancer, owns industrial buildings (7 objects). About 2 years ago, he was asked to sell one building. He refused. Soon, the administration filed a lawsuit against the demolition of these buildings, indicating the wrong address so that the trial would pass without his participation and it could be presented to the executive sheet on the demolition of objects that had entered into legal force. But since interim measures were imposed in the form of a ban on the location of any persons on the territory, the bailiffs came to seal the buildings and informed the owner that he was the defendant in the claim for the demolition and release of the site. So far, the defendant did not know anything, the court at the request of the administration appointed the examination to the expert organization controlled by the court and the administration. At this time, the buildings are trying to break. The police stopped, but the criminal case does not initiate. Expert surveyor by photographs recognizes all buildings with emergency and demolition. Reviews (there are 3), made by various organizations, introduced to the case, they say the opposite that the buildings can be operated and repaired. In addition, during the judicial investigation, the defense party filed a petition for the withdrawal of an expert organization and experts, filed the fake of the examination, asked to interrogate the specialist and appoint a second examination to another independent organization. The petitions were rejected. The interrogation of a specialist from the side of defense was postponed four times in order to get tired of traveling from Krasnodar. As a result, the court did not want to warn her of criminal liability so that her information did not become evidence. At this time, the bailiffs sold the building that was asked to sell the owner, despite the interim measures imposed by the court. Then the court of first instance issued a decision and ordered to demolish all objects, except for the sold, citing a decision to the fact that no one supposedly disputed the examination. As well as the opinion of the expert, who at the hearing said that the buildings are emergency. The court considered that the buildings that are behind the capital fence can threaten life and health and obliged the owner to demolish everything except one building sold by the bailiffs. He refused to repair, despite the fact that the owner was presented with a detailed repair plan for each existing crack. If the defendant does not destroy his property, then he is a disabled pensioner without a kidney with lung cancer with a monthly income in August in the month of a little more than 10 thousand rubles. It will be necessary to pay a penalty of 7 thousand rubles. per day.