One of the speakers, L. Waldman, talks about the need to interview people “ideologically close to us and with experience.” “Already in previous seminars, Vitaly said that he would really like to ask Anatoly (Chubais-Ed) in more detail and arrange a “production interview” with him. [семинар от 19.05.2023]. This is absolutely correct, because Anatoly is the bearer of an experience that almost none of us possess. Sergei Ignatiev is another candidate for an interview, if only he would agree. These are people who have experience that is not described anywhere, which in itself is valuable for understanding what kind of country we are dealing with.” Waldman also calls other potential interviewers, including Nabiullina, as “ideologically close.” “It would be wonderful, and it would be a very necessary part of the work of writing a description of the country whose future the Center will be designing,” Waldman believes.
To this Chubais says that those who hold positions will not give interviews yet. There will be no interviews while “Nabiullina works as Nabiullina. Just as Ignatiev would not have given you any interview while he was working as Ignatiev, and I would not have given any interview while I was working as Chubais. And now I don’t work with Chubais and I’m ready to give any interview, just without publication,” says Chubais.
Another participant in the seminar, Lankov, expresses confidence that the named persons, having left their positions, “will appear here,” that is, in the West.
https://t.me/vchkogpu/43258?single
VChK-OGPU
Chubais: “I will defend the power model from any half-hearted liberals.”
The Cheka-OGPU continues to study Anatoly Chubais’s speech at a closed seminar for “his own people,” which, as Chubais himself admitted, is in fact the only place where he can not publicly…
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
