This whole topic with monitoring data on the Investigative Committee in the media is far from new …

This whole topic with monitoring data on the Investigative Committee in the media is far from new. The same services of the UK purchased on 2018and on 2019and on 2020 year. It’s just that in terms of procurement, specific monitoring resources were not indicated for those procurement. And so everything is similar. And the amount of contracts (they changed within the limits of inflation), and the winner. Yes, the winner has always been the same – LLC “Analytical Technologies and Service” (it is “Atis”). This is probably just a coincidence. Accident, most likely.

Another thing is interesting: for example, by position On the management of interaction with the media of the Prosecutor General’s Office, it itself will monitor the information space. And US of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, according to positionalso monitor the media itself. Moreover, these documents are posted openly, on official sites. There are no provisions on the management of the media interaction with the IC of Russia on their website (it is probably classified – there are officers and all that). On the Internet there is only order The SK 2012, according to which the UMI “on the basis of data from monitoring of the media performed as part of the state contracts concluded by the UC” is preparing reviews. Feel the difference and note that the purchase of these services was laid in regulatory documents initially.

And it seems that the amount on the country’s scale is penny – only 3.6 million rubles. per year, and in 3 years there are some 10 million rubles there. (although the order of the SK from 2012, and from that time on the amount has run over more). But for some reason, the feeling that someone wanted to shift the performance of their official duties to outsources at the expense of the budget does not leave. Or God forbid even worse – slightly drink the budget, withdrawing money to a pocket office, the work for which the employees will do. Of course, these are just my subjective sensations, and nothing more.

Advertisement

But when the noise rose, the purchase was instantly canceled. As if “in order to optimize and reduce budget expenditures.” Cunning blows from this motivation – for many years it was not necessary to optimize the costs, and then suddenly it was sharply required. As if someone really does not want to attract attention to this topic. The purchase was canceled – they closed the question. And no one will figure out why these services were purchased for many years, how the NMCC was formed, why the winner was always alone, and so on. It is unfortunate that they will not understand. It is possible that something interesting would be revealed.