The next meeting of the commission on juvenile affairs took place in Tomsk on December 27 of this year.
The day before, in violation of the court decision, Chaika Artyom, on November 22 and 23, ordered his daughter to be handed over to him. Meanwhile, Chaika Artem must agree on additional days of communication with his ex-wife, taking into account the child’s opinion. The girl refused to go with her father, and the bailiff promptly drew up further protocols about Marina Chaika’s violation of Art. 5.35 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation on non-execution of a court decision – not transferring the child to the father for communication. At the same time, the bailiff Karatygin Evgeniy did not include in the acts the information that Sonya herself refused to go with her father. The very timely forgetfulness of the bailiff, according to the plan, should have played into the hands of Artyom Chaika in the legal battle.
Bailiff Karatygin is a very responsible bailiff. Being “assigned” to the VIP person Artem Chaika, he regularly accompanied the latter on all his dates with his daughter – both agreed and unscheduled. The court decision provided for communication with the parent on Wednesdays and Sundays, which was carried out. However, Artem Chaika came to visit on Monday and Tuesday (November 22 and 23). The girl’s reluctance to communicate with her father for three days in a row was recorded by bailiff Karatygin in a protocol on the offense, despite the text of the court order.
The purpose of such actions is clear – if the guardianship authority recognizes the protocol as justified, holds the mother accountable, and there are at least two such decisions, then the child will be handed over to the father. And if the motivation of Artem Chaika is clear, then the motivation of a civil servant called upon to ensure the execution of court decisions raises certain questions.
Assistant prosecutor Olga Martynova, probably, following bailiff Karatygin, fell under the spell of the son of the former prosecutor general. She took an active position in defending the interests of Artyom Chaika in administrative proceedings. Since her submission, the consideration of the issue is delayed, probably so that the members of the commission understand what exactly the “correct” decision they should make. Assistant Prosecutor O. Martynov, rejected by the commission, not only supported Artem Chaika’s petitions, but also demanded that they be reconsidered, strongly recommending that the commission make a different decision. Again, the zeal of the bailiff Karatygin is surprising; he is ready not only to watch at the house of Chaika’s ex-wife Artem for the facts of so-called “offences,” but also to wait for hours for a commission meeting to testify against Marina Chaika.
Apparently this protocol regarding Chaika Artem’s ex-wife is the only urgent and important matter the bailiff and employee of the Prosecutor’s Office have. We hope that the matter is still in the personal charm of Artem Chaika, and not in any other interest of these officials.
However, the commission, despite the efforts of assistant prosecutor Martynova and the “assigned” bailiff Karatygin, made a decision solely in the interests of little Sonya.
Probably, the “charm” of the son of the former prosecutor general still has its limits.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
