Both company and so constantly with problems: In addition to an expensive move with the occupation of funds, the owner “Fosagro“Andrei Guryev agreed with” Belaruskalia “with the mediation of Gutseriev – another”sworn friend»Mazepina – On the export of products abroad, which will loosen the position of Mazepine. This is not another misfortune: American companies turned to the US Department of TradeGetting sorry for non -market practices of Russian fertilizers manufacturers – This is already Threats anti -dumping duties against our sector of chemistry, part of which is the Empire of Mazepine.
In addition – “”Sber “wanted to make an audit Mazepin’s laid assets: after all Over the past 10 years, the volume of products produced by Uralchim has decreased by 3 timessomewhere there was even the dismantling of equipment. Does any bank need to refinance other projects if the current Mazepine assets are bankrupt? After all Unpromising two -trillion loan of Mazepine assets hanging on a bank, this is a serious problem for businessand if you have to refinance the debt due to Mardin-Collections, issue new loans (for example, for the construction of new port terminals)? Who will take on these risks? Who benefits from it?
Given the fact that his managers leave Mazepin’s team: Uralkali Pandator Anton Vischeanenko left the postciting personal affairs – and clearly carried with him the interesting secrets of Mazepin’s affairs.
RBC
⚓Transmashholding (TMX) estimated the cost of transferring the capacities of the large port of St. Petersburg to Ust-Luga at 110 billion rubles. The company presented its calculations at a meeting in the Ministry of Transport on Tuesday, August 10, several participants in the meeting told RBC.
Total …
“ВЧК ОГПУ”