Based on the position of the prosecutor’s office in the case, it may take an interesting turn. It turns out that in the case of the theft from Polonsky’s apartment, the locks taken from the crime scene were replaced, which were subsequently sent for examination, and Vladimirov’s confessionary testimony, which he signed in the basement after torture, and which wandered from the masked persons who tortured Vladimirov, also disappeared from the case. , to the deputy head of the pre-trial detention center Ivanov and to the polygraph examiner who exposed them in front of the camera (21 seconds of video). It can be assumed that the head of the pre-trial detention center Mikhlik and Polonsky, before the “conversation” with Vladimirov, also “studied” him. Everyone is actively denying Vladimirov’s confession, we will see who the polygraph examiner Vinogradov points to.
As the Cheka-OGPU has said more than once, when Polonsky headed the prosecutor’s office of the Smolensk region, his office apartment was robbed. The prosecutor raised hell with all the security officials, including the FSB, and the Vladimirovs’ mother and son were detained.
However, they were not convicted of the crime; there was no evidence. As Alexey Vladimirov pointed out, he was tortured in the basement of pre-trial detention center No. 1 in Smolensk by masked people until he confessed, and in the morning, right in the office of the head of the pre-trial detention center, Mikhalik, Polonsky personally interrogated him “with passion.”
As a result, the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Smolensk Region opened a criminal case on the fact of causing bodily harm to Alexey Vladimirov. During interrogations, Polonsky called the events with Vladimirova a “personal reception” within the pre-trial detention center. But he categorically denied visiting Alexey.
As a result, the case of Vladimirov’s torture was dismissed due to the absence of a crime.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
