Now this is called “verification of the correctness and relevance of information about the UK”, but judging by the terms of reference, the Investigative Committee is interested in a lot. For example, “loud political statements.” I wonder why monitor them? What, began to engage in a political investigation? Although there, in terms of reference, it is directly stated that the press service wants to track the topics in the media, and not regarding the activities of the UK, which is discussed vaguely-“the customer specified the day before.” And the SK can ask any topic. Here is a fresh example:
The press service of the SK Identifiedthat the media again illuminated the story with a stray zoo in Chelyabinsk. There, a local resident allegedly offers people in the park in exchange for a donation to play with animals attached to trees or take a picture with them. Earlier, on this fact, the regional SK has already been conducted, however, as noted in the material, the situation with the stray zoo has not changed. Indeed, it is strange: the procedural check was carried out, and the zoo is still wandering. Of course, the chairman demanded a report. Apparently, he wants to appreciate the torment of the work of Chelyabinsk investigators who tried to pull at least some kind of composition to this zoo.
In general, if someone makes some kind of political statement, or the zoo will defeat somewhere, then all this will not slip past the attention of the press service of the UK. And it doesn’t matter that all this is to the procedural activity, which is the main task of the UK, has nothing to do. The main thing is inexpensive – for just 1,912,000 rubles. For six months.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”