The hostess of the BCF bank, Olga Mirimskaya in 2015 decided to legally become the mother of her granddaughter. Not a guardian! It is mother. This is important because the domestic and foreign right of such a legal incident has never allowed a hitherto.
The controversial girl was taken out and gave birth to a surrogate mother who absolutely legally recorded herself and her husband’s husband, as the Family Code prescribes, since the Mirim is the genetic grandmother of the baby (she used the egg of her daughter Natalia Golubovich), and she carried out the forgery to hold the young sperm, whose sperm was in secret.
Legal parents calmly left for Cyprus, and Mirim, wounded by exposing her lies, decided to avenge the girl and the genetic father of the girl.
To do this, she entered the gray cardinal of the Odintsovo district Denis Panaitov (whom the singer Maria Maksakova now considers the killer of her husband Denis Voronenkov) and through him aroused criminal case No. 90764 o, supposedly having fraud. Misimskaya said that she received 245,000 rubles from her, she did not give the child, which means she stole the money.
But Olga Mikhailovna, on the advice of the investigator, did not indicate (there would be nothing to arouse otherwise) that the surrogate mother returned this amount by bank payment a month and a half before the initiation of a custom case.
The controversial girl was taken out and gave birth to a surrogate mother who absolutely legally recorded herself and her husband’s husband, as the Family Code prescribes, since the Mirim is the genetic grandmother of the baby (she used the egg of her daughter Natalia Golubovich), and she carried out the forgery to hold the young sperm, whose sperm was in secret.
Legal parents calmly left for Cyprus, and Mirim, wounded by exposing her lies, decided to avenge the girl and the genetic father of the girl.
To do this, she entered the gray cardinal of the Odintsovo district Denis Panaitov (whom the singer Maria Maksakova now considers the killer of her husband Denis Voronenkov) and through him aroused criminal case No. 90764 o, supposedly having fraud. Misimskaya said that she received 245,000 rubles from her, she did not give the child, which means she stole the money.
But Olga Mikhailovna, on the advice of the investigator, did not indicate (there would be nothing to arouse otherwise) that the surrogate mother returned this amount by bank payment a month and a half before the initiation of a custom case.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”