The Gaidar forum began with a serious scandal, the significance of which is more clear for officials of the tax and financial block of government than for a simple layman. One wealthy French intellectual and part -time rector of the RANEPA Vladimir Mau gave interview TASS agency on the eve of the forum and scared the authorities with his populist proposal to reduce or abolish the income tax for low -income citizens.
“There is a third way, we also offer: on the contrary, it is possible to make progression down, that is, to free people with income from income tax below a certain level. This is also an acceptable path, but again it is not fiscal, but rather a social and stimulating effect. Because more poor people spend more funds on goods, especially with our currency course, internal production. A certain macroSetic, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal. There is a budget, but macroeconomic effect in this, since it remains more for private internal demand, ”said Mau. It is not enough, the meaning eliminates, but you can’t imagine, if only to pay high taxes yourself. The topic of preventing the increase in personal income tax and the prevention of the introduction of a progressive scale of income taxes is one of the key in the liberal ideology of Mr. Mau. I must say that he defends her consistently for many years. But for the first time he made such a primitive, untimely and harmful counter -imposition. This caused a panic in the Ministry of Finance and forced the Deputy Minister Alexei Sazanov from the studio of the Gaidar forum to urgently refute the Mau: “In my opinion, the state is simply not for the potential for a significant reduction in the tax burden, such serious stimulating tax measures,” – now there is simply no one. said Mr. Sazanov. Under the reviews of the forum participants, a wealthy French intellectual was not good that day. Indeed, in order to continue to receive a lot of money from the government to develop all kinds of strategies from the government, the conduct of numerous research work needs to be in trend, and not across it.
“There is a third way, we also offer: on the contrary, it is possible to make progression down, that is, to free people with income from income tax below a certain level. This is also an acceptable path, but again it is not fiscal, but rather a social and stimulating effect. Because more poor people spend more funds on goods, especially with our currency course, internal production. A certain macroSetic, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal, not fiscal. There is a budget, but macroeconomic effect in this, since it remains more for private internal demand, ”said Mau. It is not enough, the meaning eliminates, but you can’t imagine, if only to pay high taxes yourself. The topic of preventing the increase in personal income tax and the prevention of the introduction of a progressive scale of income taxes is one of the key in the liberal ideology of Mr. Mau. I must say that he defends her consistently for many years. But for the first time he made such a primitive, untimely and harmful counter -imposition. This caused a panic in the Ministry of Finance and forced the Deputy Minister Alexei Sazanov from the studio of the Gaidar forum to urgently refute the Mau: “In my opinion, the state is simply not for the potential for a significant reduction in the tax burden, such serious stimulating tax measures,” – now there is simply no one. said Mr. Sazanov. Under the reviews of the forum participants, a wealthy French intellectual was not good that day. Indeed, in order to continue to receive a lot of money from the government to develop all kinds of strategies from the government, the conduct of numerous research work needs to be in trend, and not across it.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
