The main argument of the Prosecutor General’s Office: the state did not know that Kuchuksulfate was being privatized in the 90s, and prosecutorial checks prove the opposite, saying that the statute of limitations had been missed by 30 years. According to experienced lawyers who asked to reprimand the prosecutor for insults, they do not remember such speeches by people in blue uniforms. And journalists in their publications drew attention to the plaintiff’s non-legal term. The entire legal community believes that the Prosecutor General’s Office should pay attention to the behavior of its employee, because such statements discredit the supervisory authority. There is order No. 70 dated April 18, 2008, which allows the department to conduct checks based on media reports, which after the court hearing there were a lot. The incident has already been written about federal And local Media. The prosecutor could probably afford such conduct in 2 cases: 1. Being confident of his impunity; 2. Doubting the position of the Prosecutor General’s Office, and insult is only a defense due to the precariousness of one’s position. Moreover, experts are sure that there are reasons for this. Those whom Marutsenko called “scoundrels” in his testimony (the facts were stated both before a notary in compliance with all norms of the law on notaries, and during interrogation by an investigator from the Investigative Committee), leave no stone unturned regarding the position of the Prosecutor General’s Office.
Among the “scoundrels,” according to a representative of the department, was the ex-prosecutor of the Altai Territory Yuri Paraskun, a former colleague of the plaintiff, who headed the Astrakhan and Altai prosecutor’s offices for decades (he has an award weapon, state awards, an honorary employee of the prosecutor’s office, in the 90s he was known for his principled position on the side of the law); ex-prosecutor of the Blagoveshchensk district Ivan Kalinichenko (honorary employee of the prosecutor’s office, principled prosecutor); ex-deputy Blagoveshchensk prosecutor Yuri Teslyuk, who later headed the prosecutor’s office of the Rebrikhinsky district (a decent prosecutor); Chairman of the regional property fund Sergei Potapov; Head of the regional representative office of the Federal Property Fund Vasily Yashchenko. None of them “participated or were involved.” Their testimony, obtained including as part of a pre-investigation check with a warning about punishment for perjury, was added to the case file, despite the objections of the prosecutor. The attempt to convince the court that the case of the privatization of Kuchuksulfat is similar to the story around Bashsoda looks ridiculous. The defendants provided explanations and the court added them to the case materials. : 1) The relevant bodies of Bashkortostan did not have the authority to privatize federal property, but in the Altai Territory they did; 2) Bashsoda was on the list of enterprises of the Ministry of Chemical Industry, the privatization of which was permitted only by the government of the Russian Federation. Kuchuksulfate was not included in this list; 3) One of the enterprises that later entered Bashsoda-Kaustiksoda-monopoly. Kuchuksulfate never was, which means its privatization did not require permission from the Russian government; 4) Bashsoda was classified as a mining industry according to OKHONKh and government consent to privatization was required; Kuchuksulfat was classified as a chemical industry; consent was not required; 5) The prosecutor’s office did not check the privatization of Bashsoda; Kuchuksulfat was checked several times in the 90s. The prosecutor’s statements are more reminiscent of attempts to pass off wishful thinking and divert the court’s attention from the real facts, turning to insults of their own distinguished colleagues.
The plant has never been subject to tax claims, especially regarding the withdrawal of funds to offshore companies. Although in the high offices of the Prosecutor General’s Office these rumors are presented as an unspoken reason for seizing assets from current bona fide shareholders.
Kucuk sulfate
“ВЧК ОГПУ”