So, in Fedorov’s mail there is a letter on behalf of Yulia Vladimirovna Arkhipova, a judge of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District. Arkhipova Yu.V. worked as a governess-tutor for Fedorov S.I., preparing a written assignment for him, answers to questions and sending from her personal mailing address uliya_dv@mail.ru to the work address of Ryabzin R.A. Ryabzin_ra@vsrf.ru. (Task 1, Task 2)
In the properties of the sent files, the author of the file is Yuliya Vladimirovna Arkhipova, and the place where the file was created is the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District.
Thus, an episode of Fedorov’s life is the falsification of exam results – the candidate came to the exam with 100% understanding of which ticket he will “pull out”, with pre-prepared answers to questions and a solution to the problem that he supposedly “has to” solve (when passing the qualification The exam requires oral answers to questions and the completion of a written task – preparation of a judicial act).
What are the reasons for such connivance on the part of Lebedev V.M.?
Analysis of the correspondence of Fedorov S.I. answers this question and how and why a young man who had never worked as a judge earned the opportunity to become the head of one of the key courts of the Russian Federation – the Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region.
Analysis of S.I. Fedorov, declassified due to inaccuracy. official documentation shows the role of Fedorov S.I. in exile from the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation O.M. Sviridenko, his assistants D.V. Tafintseva. and Vorobyova O.A.
Thus, a significant amount of official information is devoted to certificates regarding O.M. Sviridenko. about the allegedly unsatisfactory results of work personally by O.M. Sviridenko. and his staff (Tafintseva D.V., Vorobyova O.A.), violation of procedural deadlines, issuance of obviously illegal judicial acts, conflicts of interest and lobbying the interests of a number of business entities.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
