“At 05.31 in the Naro-Fominsk city district, village. Kalininets, a UAV crashed into military warehouses”;
“At 05:33 in the Naro-Fominsk city district, village. Kalininets, a UAV has fallen, fire, smoke, the second one is flying”;
“At 05:39 in the Naro-Fominsk city district, village. Kalininets, 2 UAVs, artillery depots, the second one flew into a residential area.”
At the same time, the data was transmitted via line 112 by the military and directly from the unit. But after a little time, when the position was built, it was officially established that the UAVs fell NEAR the artillery depots and the fuel and lubricants warehouse. The first fall occurred at 05:27 near ammunition depots, it hit concrete on the internal road of the warehouse, fragments of the device were found. At 05:50, the second UAV crash occurred: the drone allegedly crashed into a tree on the border of the fence and the outside of the fuel and lubricants warehouse; fragments at the explosion site were found within a radius of about 30 meters. At the same time, in both cases, eyewitnesses heard “pops,” and the “silence regime” continued in the unit all day long. Considering the good staffing of the Taman division and its infrastructure, they could easily hide a serious emergency and cope with the same fire on their own.
The third UAV of the morning, which crashed in the village of Lukino, in New Moscow also does not resemble a device “suppressed” by electronic warfare forces. According to information from the first and only applicant (local resident Lyubov), an object “the size of a car flew over the village at an extremely low altitude, and then fell and exploded in a field near the Pakhra River.”
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
