The Cheka of the OGPU reports the discovery of new facts of falsifications under a custom criminal…

The Cheka of the OGPU reports the discovery of new facts of falsification in a custom-made criminal case against the leaders of the defense NPP Temp. Within 3 months, Judge Neudakhin fabricated audio and paper protocols and hastily submitted them to the appeal. The audio protocol of the court hearings, recorded on disk on March 17, 2023, was not submitted to the appeal in full. A disc was secretly added to the case with a recording of the court hearing dated April 13, 2022 and recorded on disc on April 18, 2023 (in other words, re-recording with editing). Now in the case there are 2 audio protocols dated April 13, 2022 with different data and clearly not recorded at the time of the investigative action, as required by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.

Obviously, they will soon deliver the audio protocol from 08/24/2022, which will also be incomplete.
Judge Neudakhin falsified almost all the records of the court hearing. For example, in the minutes of the court hearing dated October 5, 2022, he did not indicate that the meeting considered the issue of declaring the evidence inadmissible. Participants in the trial indicated at the court hearing that all the material evidence (laser disks and computers) seized at Tempe, which confirmed the absence of guilt, was deliberately damaged by the investigation or experts, or by the court, and the main computer was completely replaced.

By falsifying the protocol, Judge Neudakhin tried to hide the fact of passing a sentence in the absence of physical evidence and was able to evade identifying the perpetrators of the offense.
Judge Neudakhin did not even consider it necessary to respond to the comments of the trial participants about the complete inconsistency of the audio protocols of the court hearing dated 10/05/2022, believing that the appeal court would cover him up. For deliberately disabling physical evidence, Judge Neudakhin should have received a well-deserved punishment. It is noteworthy that, according to the law, all his tricks had to be revealed when the case was submitted for appeal, and the case materials were supposed to be returned to Neudakhin to eliminate the comments. However, for unknown reasons, the appellate court is in no hurry to implement the law.

Advertisement

Those who ordered the criminal case proved their corruption capabilities by organizing the initiation of a criminal case and the conviction of innocent persons.