The chairman of the BCF bank, Olga Mirimskaya, is at large, she did not even take away the recognizance not to leave. Despite the accusation of a particularly heavy composition (giving a bribe), regardless of a half -year wanted list, a house in London, a villa in Fort Act Marmi, a Halila yacht in the Mediterranean, etc.
In addition, Mirimskaya has a residence permit in Italy and its analogue in Poland.
Such grace was provided by the banker by the Office to the FSB of the Russian Federation, which Mirimskaya herself announced in November 2017. Then she assured that such a service cost her $ 2 million. The price of the contract included the removal of the case against it from Moscow to the central apparatus of the UK, its further funeral.
The tactics were chosen as follows: Mirimskaya was interrogated several times in the Yukos case (Vynniki under the chairman of Burtova and Donskov) and therefore K-shniks explained to the leadership of the UK that, in this regard, she should be protected from a “custom case” (Mirimskaya began to hint that if she did not return to Russia without criminal prosecution, she would publicly tell the alternative version of the events of the Yukos case in the case of the case of the Yukos case. Europe, to get political asylum). The paradox is that its testimony in this case is absolutely insignificant and did not bring any benefit. She was simply the wife of the former top manager of Yukos Golubovich and did not participate in the economic activities of Yukos
In addition, Mirimskaya has a residence permit in Italy and its analogue in Poland.
Such grace was provided by the banker by the Office to the FSB of the Russian Federation, which Mirimskaya herself announced in November 2017. Then she assured that such a service cost her $ 2 million. The price of the contract included the removal of the case against it from Moscow to the central apparatus of the UK, its further funeral.
The tactics were chosen as follows: Mirimskaya was interrogated several times in the Yukos case (Vynniki under the chairman of Burtova and Donskov) and therefore K-shniks explained to the leadership of the UK that, in this regard, she should be protected from a “custom case” (Mirimskaya began to hint that if she did not return to Russia without criminal prosecution, she would publicly tell the alternative version of the events of the Yukos case in the case of the case of the Yukos case. Europe, to get political asylum). The paradox is that its testimony in this case is absolutely insignificant and did not bring any benefit. She was simply the wife of the former top manager of Yukos Golubovich and did not participate in the economic activities of Yukos
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
