Several years ago, a woman was under protection in a case that involved local law enforcement. Now, as revenge, the security forces falsified a case of theft, which did not happen.
According to investigators, they extorted 20 million rubles from the Gulyaev family. for stopping the investigation, businessman Oleg Gulyaev stole an old minibus from the local crime boss Svekla, who beat his wife. In 2019, a case was opened against him, and miracles began. This case may be included in criminal law textbooks as an example of falsification.
In November 2020, the prosecutor’s office confirmed violations committed during the investigation of the case, and the deputy regional prosecutor Gantsev took personal control of it:
– Gantsev repeatedly made demands to the leadership of the State Investigative Directorate to eliminate violations during the investigation of the case, which were satisfied, but have not yet been fulfilled. Chekhov prosecutor Khripunov and zonal prosecutor Zhelanov openly say that fulfillment of the demands made by Gantsev is not necessary.
Khripunov comments on this nonsense: “The demands made by the deputy regional prosecutor Gantsev are obliged to be fulfilled by the investigative bodies, but their fulfillment must be sought by the person who made the demands.” That is, Gantsev himself must do this.
– In the case materials, Gulyaev’s defense discovered the absence of the specified requirements, petitions, complaints and responses to them, the extension of the investigation beyond 12 months, video recordings and other evidence of the non-involvement of Gulyaev and Zavodnov.
– The case, which in March 2020 was taken from the Chekhov police to the main headquarters near Moscow due to its particular complexity, is being returned to the district to those who falsified it.
The case materials were thoroughly cleared by investigator Ovchukov. Investigator Stupitskaya, who fabricated evidence, was given only part of the materials. She continues to “clean up her tails” in order to avoid responsibility for falsifying the case and the illegal arrest of two people.
– The leadership of the regional prosecutor’s office is deliberately not informed of the real picture of the investigation. The head of the 16th Directorate, Baklitsky, and his subordinate Zhelanov sabotage Gantsev’s orders or convey distorted information to him. Thus, the leadership of the 16th department is trying to hide from their superiors the lack of supervision and procedural violations committed in the preliminary investigation. Gantsev passed by complaints against lower-ranking prosecutors, against investigators from the regional headquarters and the Chekhov police department. Defense petitions with Gantsev’s resolutions for a personal reception of the Gulyaevs from the regional prosecutor are thrown into the trash can. As a result, the case from the 16th department, bypassing the leadership of the regional prosecutor’s office, is returned to the district to prosecutor Khripunov, who is in official dependence on the same Baklitsky, who is responsible for the lack of proper supervision.
This intradepartmental ping-pong is organized to quietly approve a particularly serious indictment, without any evidence of the guilt of Gulyaev and Zavodnov.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”