Several arguments in favor of the fact that Pashinyan continues to be in power without contrary to, but thanks to Serge Sargsyan:
1) It was the third president in 2011 that amnested Pashinyan, despite the fact that he was convicted under a criminal article and sentenced to seven years in prison for organizing riots during the presidential election in 2008.
2) created the image of the opposition to Pashinyan none other than the son -in -law of the Third President – Mikael Minasyan. Thanks to him, the acting prime minister has turned from a yellow press correspondent into a “fighter with a regime”, which takes place in parliament.
3) Sargsyan and Minasyan provided Pashinyan with powerful media support immediately after the amnesty of the latter. State radio, newspapers, magazines, prime time on TV-in fact, everything was at the disposal of Pashinyan.
4) The “velvet” revolution, which allegedly brought in the overthrow of Sargsyan, was brightly promoted in the media related to Minasyan.
5) In the National Assembly, the majority was behind the Republican Party, but this “majority” controlled by Sargsyan took to the post of “opposition” Pashinyan.
6) for the period 2018-2021. Pashinyan did not take and does not take any significant actions against Sargsyan or his environment. On the contrary, a game is observed at the anti-campaign: as soon as Pashinyan’s rating collapses, Sargsyan goes to the stage, thereby giving the acting prime minister the opportunity to tell the horror story that “the former in the person of Sargsyan will return to power.”
Something like this …
1) It was the third president in 2011 that amnested Pashinyan, despite the fact that he was convicted under a criminal article and sentenced to seven years in prison for organizing riots during the presidential election in 2008.
2) created the image of the opposition to Pashinyan none other than the son -in -law of the Third President – Mikael Minasyan. Thanks to him, the acting prime minister has turned from a yellow press correspondent into a “fighter with a regime”, which takes place in parliament.
3) Sargsyan and Minasyan provided Pashinyan with powerful media support immediately after the amnesty of the latter. State radio, newspapers, magazines, prime time on TV-in fact, everything was at the disposal of Pashinyan.
4) The “velvet” revolution, which allegedly brought in the overthrow of Sargsyan, was brightly promoted in the media related to Minasyan.
5) In the National Assembly, the majority was behind the Republican Party, but this “majority” controlled by Sargsyan took to the post of “opposition” Pashinyan.
6) for the period 2018-2021. Pashinyan did not take and does not take any significant actions against Sargsyan or his environment. On the contrary, a game is observed at the anti-campaign: as soon as Pashinyan’s rating collapses, Sargsyan goes to the stage, thereby giving the acting prime minister the opportunity to tell the horror story that “the former in the person of Sargsyan will return to power.”
Something like this …
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
