So, there are two decisions at stake:
First. The state will do capitalize Rusnano for 230-250 billion rubles, creditors receive their investments and interest; Rusnano managers continue to receive their crazy salary, another 10-15 projects will be invested, which will end with losses, decommissioning and reasoning about the lack of demand for innovation.
There is another way: the state will pay exactly as much as it should pay (about 120 billion rubles), and lenders will have to receive the remaining money through the bankruptcy procedure.
The second path is the most legitimate, the most correct, the most liberal.
Lobbyists of the first option are obvious – these are creditors, A. Chubais and S. Kulikov.
The Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation should advocate the second option, but A. Chubais’s pressure on A. Siluanov holds back the tough and unequivocal statements of the ministry.
What option will be adopted as a basis, we learn on December 1, by this moment the fate of the issue of bonds that has not been provided with state guarantees should be decided.
We will observe, but no matter how this story ends – it already allows us to draw conclusions and has its consequences.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”