Also “retroactively” and with the assignment of a unique number previously assigned to another judicial act, Marchenkova N.V. a ruling was made to replace the judge dated September 24, 2020.
The specified determination has a unique number, previously assigned to another judicial act in another case.
The judicial act prepared “retroactively” was not published on the court’s website.
In order to legalize her actions and publish a previously falsified judicial act on the court’s website, Marchenkova N.V. again “retroactively” produced it, while changing its content.
As a result, we have: 1) a judicial act, with a unique number from another case; 2) a judicial act published on the court’s website more than a year and a half later, but with a different content.
Thus, Marchenkova N.V. within the framework of case No. A41-108693/2017, she prepared judicial acts “retroactively” three times (the judge of the Shevchenko district drew attention to one of these facts).
These facts cannot be justified by an ordinary mistake by a judge, a program failure, a heavy workload or other circumstances. These facts indicate, at a minimum, the disciplinary offenses of N.V. Marchenkova, which were covered up by the chairman of the court, I. Vorobyeva.
Fair questions arise:
Can Marchenkova N.V. continue to be the chairman of the judiciary?
Is N.V. Marchenkova worthy? position of Deputy Chairman of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region?
What is the reason for the increased attention of N.V. Marchenkova? to case A41-108693/2017?
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
