The arguments of the investigator Mamadalieva, who refused to initiate the case, deserve attention: there is no alleged composition 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, because the norm was introduced in 2019, after which Tyurik’s actions did not confirm his status “Thief in Law”. This is a precedent that threatens to form the practice of “forgiveness” of any “old -regime” authorities. And at the same time, open the next loophole for earnings of various decisors from the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
Vladimir Tyurin himself should pay attention to the fact that Maria Maksakova beats at the most relevant point, demanding to initiate a matter under Article 159 of the Criminal Code. Here we are obvious about the theft of shares of the company, which owns a mansion at Podkopaevsky Lane in Moscow.
Vershinin early was an assistant to Maksakova in the State Duma, that is, he had a limit of trust. Tyurik invited the singer to sell him 75% at JSC I.L. M⁵ AG “(inheritance after the death of Father Maksakova), which owned an office of an area of 950 squares in Podkopaevsky Lane, d.9/2. The share was estimated at 1.000,000 euros. Under the contract at 17.527 euros. The transaction was drawn up by the lawyer Vershinin, for which he flew to Riga, where Maksakova gave a concert. As usual in the criminal world, without a sucker, life is bad – the seller did not see real money.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”