The most persistent bond holders won, as well as those who initially knew that the payments would take place. In relation to the rest of the participants in this story, it is too early to draw conclusions, nevertheless, only a small part of more than one hundred and fifty billion debt of the corporation is repaid, but still let’s try.
The key participant in history, the former leader RUSNANO Chubais suffered, it would seem, the most sensitive losses.
Firstly, in terms of reputation. Of course, the reputation is probably what is least of all concerned by A. Chubais. But one thing is obvious – the image of the “effective leader” completely disappeared, from now on, not a single business project associated with his name will receive a dime of funding – either from the state or from private investors.
Secondly, in the part of the team. Until recently, the Chubais team looked monolithic, the slogans on Facebook such as “We built nano -industrial” and “We have something to be proud” for mobilizing. Now, the mood has changed dramatically: people are psychologically not ready to be responsible for failures and want to shift the guilt to the leader. In such a situation, and even without active support of former employees by ASNIS AND Partners, the personal risks of A. Chubais and members of the board are increasing multiplying.
But Chubais won time. Today, a year after his departure from Rusnano, references to the “heavy legacy of Chubais” are convincing. But the further, the more the responsibility of the new leader S. Kulikov will be.
It was S. Kulikov who suffered the most crushing defeat. Firstly, he did not calculate the consequences of his “light” blackmail of the government and creditors. The market was pretty shaking, the bonds of Rusnano collapsed, also touched the bonds of other state -owned companies. Analysts, rating agencies, etc. have started talking about the reputation of the state.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
