On August 9, the Arbitration Court of the Samara Region recognized Sergei Makhlai Bankrot and VV …

On August 9, the Arbitration Court of the Samara Region recognized Sergei Makhlai Bankrot and introduced the procedure for the sale of property against him. Oleg Hohagerev from the Ural SRO of arbitration managers was appointed financial manager of Makhlaya.

On July 7, the Arbitration Court of the Samara region adopted the appropriate statement by Uralhim, the minority shareholder of PJSC Togliattiazot, and excited production. The amount of the requirements presented by Uralchim amounted to 87.665 billion rubles, of which 10.320 billion rubles were against compensation for damage caused by Uralhim, and 77.344 billion rubles – Togliattiazot. At the same time, Uralhim acts as the only proper debt collector in favor of PJSC Togliattiazot and is included in the third stage of the creditors of S. Makhlaya.

The requirement in the amount of over 87 billion rubles arose to Sergey Mahla on the basis of the accusative sentence of the Komsomolsky district court of Togliatti of July 5, 2019.

Advertisement

In accordance with the verdict, the Gallers of TOAZ Sergey Mahlai, his father Vladimir Makhlai, the owner of the Swiss company Ameropa AG, Andrew Tsivi, the director of the subsidiary of NitroChem Distributions AG Beat Ruprecht, as well as the former general director of Togliattiazot Evgeny Korolev are found guilty of fraud Large size When selling TAZ products for export. According to the verdict, they must compensate for 87-million damage, but evade it.

Earlier, Togliattiazot tried to enter the bankruptcy case of S. Mamylai, but the court did not recognize TOAZ as an appropriate lender. Trying to tighten the case in every possible way, Mahlai, together with her wife, Irina Makhlai, filed applications for her entry into the case on the basis that there was a judicial division of property between the spouses. However, the court did not calculate the right of Irina Mahlai violated and did not satisfy the petition for her entry into the case.

By the way, regarding the division of property, the statement of which was submitted by Irina Makhlai. Most likely, this is an attempt to protect part of the property of a blissful from the penalty by rewriting him to his wife. The case continues to obey in the Zamoskvoretsky court of Moscow.

The beginning of the bankruptcy procedure of S. Makhlaya and the appeal of the recovery of 87-million debt to his property can become an effective measure that will help the long-suffering toaz to return the stolen billions.