Judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Elena Kondrat filed a statement to the chair …

Judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Elena Kondrat filed a statement to the chairman of the Investigative Committee of Alexander Bastrykin. She demands to initiate the case of the investigator of the GSU of the TFR in Moscow Kondratyev, who, according to the minister of Themis, fabricated the materials against her, which served as the basis for Bastrykin’s appeal to the VKKS and the decision of the VKKS to allow the criminal prosecution of Kondrat for the giving bribes to another judge – Makhalkina. We give the most interesting excerpts from the appeal:

“… the investigative experiment by the UFSB officers in Moscow and the Moscow Region was carried out on 10/18/2020, and the statement of the judge of AGSM Makhalkina E.A. On illegal actions, Kondrat E.N., as follows from your view, was submitted to the Federal Security Service of Russia on 10/13/2020, after which the judge AGSM Makhalkina E.A. She gave her voluntary consent to participate in operational-search events.

Consequently, the application for the commission by judge Kondrat E.N. There are no kind of crime in the materials of pre-investigation verification No. 203/1-42PR-21 of the GSU in Moscow.
In your view there is no information about when to investigator Kondratiev P.A. A message was received about the perfect judge AGSM Kondrat E.N. The crime, during what period this message was checked and what procedural decisions on it were made for more than 7 (seven) months from 10/13/2020. on 05/19/2021.

Advertisement

… The conclusion of the investigator Kondratyev P.A. The composition of the crime in my actions made only on the basis of the statement and explanation of Makhalkina E.A., the explanation (report) of an employee of the Federal Security Service of the FSB in Moscow and Moshakova A.A., explanations of social activists Ponamareva S.Yu. and Moshkova R.N. (probably freelance employees of the FSB) who arrived in the place 10/11/2020. After more than 40 minutes, after the operational experiment and witnesses were not transferred.

On my repeated appeals to the investigator Kondratiev P.A. dated 06/30/2021, 06/14/2021, 06/15/2021, 06/16/2021. With the proposal to receive from me an explanation on the materials of the audit KRSOP 203/1-42PR-21 from the investigator, three letters of 07/19/2021 were received. and two from 07/27/2021. Similar content: “Due to the fact that when the submission about the consent of consent to initiate criminal proceedings, the verification materials were actually collected in full and after receiving the consent of the highest qualification collegium of the judges of the Russian Federation, they cannot be supplemented, since the volume of materials collected cannot to be changed before the income of the decision is legal.

Moreover, investigator Kondratiev P.A. The circumstances of the detention of the judge, ASGM Makhalkina E.A. With red-handed when receiving a bribe in May-June 2020. From the arbitration manager Goloshumova A.V. And when transferring by the judge, ASGM Makhalkina E.A. Brieves W. Medzhidov in the fall of 2020 ”….