...

Instead of solving the problems of the region – the end goes on a crusade on the Kremlin from the day …

no picture no picture
no picture

Instead of solving the problems of the region – the end goes on a crusade to the Kremlin

From the day of the first publication on the consequences of the ice storm in Primorye, we have encountered the branded “Konov” method of confrontation of facts – abuse and ignoring.
Instead of placing refutations, the Far Eastern newspaper people (telegramers later pulled up) bring all their response texts to the passing thesis: “We know nothing, you will lie down.”

Well, and we will continue operate with factsdelving into the issues of governor’s ignoring the Far Eastern problems.

Advertisement

The main feature of the administration Kozhemyako was and remains Obty of guilt to Moscow. Like, there were some problems in the region, but they began under the previous managers, and the Kremlin was to blame.

But such an approach – Critical error Kona.

Firstly:
Dirgining the topic of Fokino’s unprecedented bankruptcy, all the information about the debts of the BUT FOKINO was at the disposal of the regional administration since 2009, but no attempts have been made. Kozhemyako apparatchiks shift the guilt for the ruin of the city to the office of the former governor of Miklushevsky.

A simple question: standing for a post and accepting things, getting acquainted with the situation in the region, do you take the problem “on a pencil” – or are you sending them to the trash? Under Miklushevsky, the debt was very poorly repaid by the efforts of the municipality. Plus, decent money went to pay off from the rental of the port. The situation has stood up by a stake since the end of 2018, and to blame everything on its predecessor is at least stupid.

Secondly:
The current head of Fokino, Baranov, in 2010 was already the head of Fokino, until he was fired for disruption of the heating season by court decision. In 2012, he returned him to the service of Terentyev. Debt but – appeared earlier. With this connection (Terentyev-Baranov), Kozhemyako has been working well for two years. What does Moscow have to do with it are not clear.

Third:
Problems of but Fokino are solved by one strong -willed decision, supported by subsidies. Modest by Far Eastern standards, especially since the Ministry of Finance of Primorye already loves to request subsidies. And make dubious payments.

Fourthly:
Governor Kozhemyako (and his TG network) say this about emergency after icy rain in Primorye: “The lines built in the 1960-1970s work on loads ten times higher than the norm. The lines were not served, and did not change systematically. ”

Yes, everything is true. The emergency was only a matter of time. But this is a well -known problem that occurs with residents annually. What else should happen to start resolving issues?

Fifth:
A bath Russian bridge with French structures, the money for which was mastered by a certain Sur and Kostylev with a businessman Oleg Shishov. And then it became cold, the wind blew out, the rain spilled and the Russian bridge icled. No one knew what to do! One Shishov got into prison. And this story is clearly known to Mr. Kozhemyako. But, since this problem was before him, and in everything (of course) Moscow is to blame – the situation, like everyone else, is recorded in the category of unsolvable ones.

Will the conclusions be removed?

Nezigar

In Russia, its own Detroit appears-a bankrot city, a ghost city, where, like in the USA, dead will be able to vote

The Russian Federation has critical systemic errors that turn small cities (municipalities) into a gray zone. If regional structures (region, …

“ВЧК ОГПУ”