Let us recall that the shareholders of Sibtsvetmetniiproekt who were withdrawing assets initiated bankruptcy, trying to write off debts and buy liquid property at auction cheaply through frontmen. But it didn’t work out – the property complex was bought by a real investor for 180 million rubles. Former shareholders used connections among the security forces. And 2.5 years after the auction, a case was opened against Mikheev under Art. 201 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, accusing him of creating preferences for the winner. The investigation is conducted personally by the deputy head of the investigative unit of the Main Investigation Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for the Krasnoyarsk Territory – S. V. Chikirda. And this is her only business.
Former shareholders of the debtor Yuzhannikov and Nedelin, having connected connections in the judiciary, achieved the cancellation of the auction in arbitration and tried to push through unilateral restitution. However, this decision was reversed. The case is now being considered on appeal according to the rules of first instance. The shareholders are still convincing the court to “throw away” the buyer, return the property to them, and write off the creditors’ debts from the bankrupt! But journalists present at the meetings note the balanced position of Judge Radzikhovskaya, which gives hope for an independent decision.
In a criminal case the situation is the opposite. If at the beginning of the investigation it was possible to refer to the absence of S.V. Chikirda. evidence of Mikheev’s innocence, the materials have now been formed. We have a number of judicial acts that have entered into force, the public position of government agencies, confirmation of the absence of undervaluation of the property, testimony, answers and explanations from the competent authorities on how to sell buildings that are under reconstruction. It directly follows from the ORM materials that there was neither a predetermined buyer nor control over the bidding. There is not even any damage in the case, but it still does not stop!
On the contrary, new, sometimes absurd, grounds are being invented. And the statements of Mikheev himself and witnesses about offenses on the part of shareholders, supported by evidence, are ignored. Investigator Chikirda should have asked herself a long time ago who the real criminal is in this situation. But she probably already knows this. Question: where is the deputy regional prosecutor supervising the investigation, D.M. Sedykh, looking?
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
