Each district judge is already equal to the president – and this is bad both for the reputation of Themis and for the political structure as a whole. The President, of course, can afford not to pronounce aloud the name of Navalny. But the judge of the Kirovsky district court of Tomsk Karpov, who, in the decision to refuse a complaint about the default of poisoned clothes, calls him “a person claiming the role of the victim,” is too far from the stick. Replacing Navalny’s surname with other speech turnover, of course, is a political attribute in the correspondence dialogue of the state with a disgraced politician, but this approach is good in oral speech, and even then exclusively the first person, but not in the official court of court. So it will come to the point that Navalny will be planted on the next “administrative” for 15 days also anonymously or under the pseudonym “Berlin patient”, which seriously devalues such a verdict. Even Trotsky, at the time of the irreconcilable struggle with the Zinoviev-Trotskyist bloc in the judicial documents of that time, was called Trotsky, although the judges and other officials of the political system probably did not want to write and pronounce this party nickname aloud, because this “Mexican patient” was hated by Stalin. But the judicial bureaucracy, even in those days, remained a faithful generally accepted set of rules, and now it was initiative to be a differently. https://t.me/vchkogpu/12403
VChK-OGPU
The court recognized the actions of investigators of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation who refused to initiate the case of the poisoning of Alexei Navalny. The name of Femis did not want to call the name of Navalny himself in the decision and call him “a person who claims to be the victim.” The phrase promises …
“ВЧК ОГПУ”