Doctor of Economics Krichevsky published an almost academic analysis of Tatulova’s claims regarding the policy of tax support for SMEs. However, beyond the scope of his analysis was the fact that the degree of unprofessionalism and competence of the “SME Ombudsman” can only be compared with the degree of her involvement in a tangle of lobbying intrigues around very specific situations with underlying corruption. And Tatulova herself does not hesitate to talk about this. In particular, she states in dramatic colors,
…
that the business of a certain Arvydas, her acquaintance from Vladivostok, “was actually ruined by the tax authorities, who assessed additional taxes of 70 million rubles, which he, as an aggregator, did not have to pay.” In fact, Arvydas, the owner of the seaside company “What-Kuda”, used a tax evasion scheme by transferring full-time employees to the status of individual entrepreneurs. This made it possible to write off expenses on them and not pay taxes on salaries, increasing the burden on the local budget and social funds. Simply put, to receive preferences at the expense of not-so-smart, conscientious entrepreneurs in the amount of 55 million rubles, which has been proven after all possible appeals and appeals.
…
The money is big enough to interest a high-ranking person in the capital and stimulate her public invective on the topic of “fiscal villains” and the furry entrepreneur Arvydas. And this is just one of the latest examples of this kind of trouble. After all, judging by Tatulova herself, dozens of entrepreneurs turn to her. And the choice of amounts that fraudulent businessmen are trying to challenge from the tax authorities can be very wide. And tangible to support the material well-being of the “ombudsman”. So it is possible that in the near future the world will learn about new dubious combinations around taxes, the actors of which will be defended by Tatulova with all the power of her temperament, limited only by her intellect.
…
that the business of a certain Arvydas, her acquaintance from Vladivostok, “was actually ruined by the tax authorities, who assessed additional taxes of 70 million rubles, which he, as an aggregator, did not have to pay.” In fact, Arvydas, the owner of the seaside company “What-Kuda”, used a tax evasion scheme by transferring full-time employees to the status of individual entrepreneurs. This made it possible to write off expenses on them and not pay taxes on salaries, increasing the burden on the local budget and social funds. Simply put, to receive preferences at the expense of not-so-smart, conscientious entrepreneurs in the amount of 55 million rubles, which has been proven after all possible appeals and appeals.
…
The money is big enough to interest a high-ranking person in the capital and stimulate her public invective on the topic of “fiscal villains” and the furry entrepreneur Arvydas. And this is just one of the latest examples of this kind of trouble. After all, judging by Tatulova herself, dozens of entrepreneurs turn to her. And the choice of amounts that fraudulent businessmen are trying to challenge from the tax authorities can be very wide. And tangible to support the material well-being of the “ombudsman”. So it is possible that in the near future the world will learn about new dubious combinations around taxes, the actors of which will be defended by Tatulova with all the power of her temperament, limited only by her intellect.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
