Critical attention is focused on Ksenia Sobchak in connection with her “investigation” under…

Critical attention has been focused on Ksenia Sobchak in connection with her “investigation” under the heading “Crops, blocks and mining. How the government uses Telegram for propaganda.”

The reason for the release of this video was the story when Sobchak was accused of “infogypsy”, and in fact selling “success” courses “Sobchak Method”; on this fact, lawyer Ekaterina Gordon sent a statement in the interests of the victims to the Investigative Committee to Alexander Bastrykin, which was naturally covered in tg channels.

Sobchak perceived this case as targeted work on her “network of tg channels.”

Advertisement

Sobchak’s video did not evoke any special emotions in the professional community other than sarcasm; in particular, Sobchak tried to identify the beneficiaries of the channel networks, but did not conduct any special fact-checking, which ultimately resulted in the selection of random characters, who, although they may have a certain influence on a number of tg channels, are not the owners of the grids.

A similar story emerged with the selection of a price list for native/negative information and blocks in tg-channels, which turned out to be outdated in some places and far from reality in others.

Sobchak made a special emphasis in her video on the so-called “mochilovo” and blocks, while she was immediately pointed out that after the well-known story with a car accident in Sochi, Sobchak tried to block the dissemination of this information in TG channels as much as possible, which was what Sergei Minaev asked .

In addition, people associated with Sobchak’s tg channel reported the presence of censorship in her “media”, and cases of demolition of posts in Sobchak’s tg channel on sensitive topics arise constantly.

A number of observers also drew attention to the list of invited “experts” for Sobchak’s video, which in fact are very, very difficult to call such.

As a result, Sobchak’s “investigation” about Telegram turned out to be as superficial and hyper-conspiratorial as possible, especially indicating the presence of personal interest in her on the part of a certain mythical 5th directorate of the FSB, while Sobchak loses sight of the fact that a number of stories with her participation are ordinary news feeds , and stories with a negative connotation naturally have greater potential for public interest than situations with a positive connotation.
@ruarbitr

“ВЧК ОГПУ”