The facts set forth in the materials relate to the actions of the lawyers Dmitry Veshin, Natalia Vasilyeva and Sergey Grevtsova. As follows from the appeal, Vesin and Vasiliev, using the applicant’s trust, entered into a series of contracts with her, having issued fictitious debt. On the initiative of Vynina, a contract of sale of a land plot worth 9.6 million rubles belonging to his son the applicant was signed. The funds under the contract were not actually transferred, but the plot was subsequently sold to a third party, and the money was assigned.
After that, Vynin demanded a personal reward of 150 thousand US dollars. Part of the transactions was carried out through the structure of Petreleo LLC, with the execution of additional loan agreements with it. All this is only in order to then show claims, backed up by fake bank extracts, and bring a person to complete financial collapse.
Separate attention in the document is paid to the actions of the lawyer Grevtsov, who first represented the interests of the applicant, and then – her procedural opponents, including Veshina and LLC Petreleo. In the fact of a conflict of interests, he received a disciplinary warning from the Russian Law Chamber.
According to the same documents, Bartolius lawyers represented the interests of the foreign company Breavy Limited (Seychelles). According to the applicant, the money could be directly on the personal accounts of individual partners, bypassing the account of the account of lawyer education. Violations of financial control here are not an accident, but an element of the scheme.
At the time of submission of the appeal, Dmitry Vynin and the managing partner Julius Ty have not been in the territory of the Russian Federation for more than a year. One – in Malaysia, the second is allegedly in Europe
“ВЧК ОГПУ”