Against the backdrop of generations of generations of the first major owners who appeared in the Russian economy back in the 90s, the struggle for the largest inherits becomes one of the main and exciting plots of the current political, economic and corporate life.
In the case of Trubnikov, relatives are judging, believing that the trusting manager appointed after the death of the businessman works against them. Moreover, in the last days Messages appearedthat the company has undergone raider captureorganized by a newly -minted president Natura Siberica.
The relatives of Trubnikov throw the courts with lawsuits, but, we repeat, now the company is captured by raiders, so by the time the final is issued, and let’s hope, a fair verdict in the interests of legal heirs, from Natura Siberica There may be horns and legs.
The second story is no less impressive. The multimillionaire Burlakov suddenly died this year from the consequences of Kovid-19 in the hospital near Moscow, where he found himself in a strange way, although he lived mainly in Monaco. The circumstances of his death also They look foggybut the active public behavior of the sister and niece of the deceased, the rights to inheritance possessing far from primarily, but also some Nikolai Kazakova The husband of the sister, depicting almost the main and equal partner and top manager of the deceased.
Although, according to various sources, he was nothing more than an assistant on general issues.
It was at Kazakov in his hands, according to rumors, that the significant part of the billionth state of Burlakov, which the Cossacks, obviously, did not want to release. Which, in turn, caused legal claims by heirs – wife and two daughters.
Both Trubnikov and Burlakov seemed to have entered the divorce proceedings, but in both cases, legal marriages remained valid. So the widows, and most importantly, the children of the deceased, remain the heirs of the first stage.
In the conflict with the inheritance of Burlakov on the side of the sister-muzha-nephew, there were no so-called “Solved”, specifically, without Ksenia Sobchak and her status mother. However, when it became known that for the successful resolution of the dispute, Ksenia Anatolyevna, supposedly, should receive half of the inherited property, a secular lioness hastened to name this information “real fantasy“. The same “Fantasy“, Like her story with the crab business, which developed almost exactly the same scheme?
In both stories typical of modern Russia, we see two fundamental problems:
1️⃣ There is no transparent taxation of operations with an inheritance created with the direct and indirect participation of the country of Russia and many of its citizens;
2️⃣ The rights of legal heirs, first of all, widows and children, as well as corporate legislation, are impudently trampled by third parties, corporate treasures hunters.
Either the state will make certain efforts so that these conflicts are resolved in accordance with the law, or Russia risks the country not only with a frank poisonous business climate, but also with an inheritance inheritance right.
We are waiting for new cases, and they will certainly.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”