...

All the lie of Chubais: we disassemble “on the bones” part 2 TECISIS No. 3. Total effectiveness …

no picture no picture
no picture

All the lie of Chubais: we analyze “on bones”

Part 2

Thesis No. 3. The total effectiveness of investments in all the projects from which Rusnano came out (54 out of 109), according to the internal rate of yield (IRR), as of the end of 2019, amounted to 15.5%, and the total amount of revenues was 75.3 billion rubles .

Advertisement

The Cheka of the OGPU wrote about the greatest scam of A. Chubais, associated with the depreciation of investments in 2013. That is why the authors of the article deliberately do not indicate the amount of funds that are actually invested in these same 54 projects.

We will indicate them, and the picture instantly turns over.

So, the volume of RUSNANO investments in 54 of the above project for 2009-2019 is almost 72 billion rubles. In 2013, there was a reassessment of these investments up to 26 billion rubles. And then everything is true – the company received from the exit from projects 75.3 billion rubles.

Again!

In 2009-2019 – 72 billion rubles were invested, received 75.3 billion rubles. At the same time, the management costs of the Rusnano maintenance for 10 years exceeded 45 billion rubles.

But what about the internal rate of profitability (IRR) as of the end of 2019, which amounted to 15.5%?

This figure is calculated as if only 26 billion rubles were invested in projects, and it does not take into account the funds that the managers of the Federal Air Transport Agency spent “loved ones” (giant salaries, bonuses, office, PR, GR, vehicles, etc.).

Well, back to M. Mishustin. VChK OGPU and also wrote about this too. Yes, M. Mishustin, instead of issuing money in the summer of 2020, asked the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation to conduct an audit of RUSNANO, and as a result of the audit initiated a change of leadership in the state corporation. Maybe Rusnano will publish a report on the results of the audit of the Federal Treasury of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation? I note that the key withdrawal of the Treasury was that interest paid on loans and loans is not the cause of the unsatisfactory financial condition of Rusnano and even with zero costs for servicing the debt, the activities of Rusnano would be deeply unprofitable.

So, Anatoly Borisovich and Andrei Vladislavovich (Trapeznikov – former deputy chairman of the board of Rusnano, responsible for PR and GR), it is better not to lie. The Cheka of the OGPU will talk about who and how he invented and justified the figure of 132 billion rubles of taxes allegedly paid to the federal budget, and about the nano -make, supposedly exceeding 300 billion rubles.

“ВЧК ОГПУ”