Part 1
The Bell December 3, 2021 Published an article “Chubais as a state man did not protest.” How “Rusnano” was on the verge of default. “
Judging by the abundance of numbers, the article claims to be a deep analysis, but in fact it is hastily a slapped article only shows the degree of falsehood and resourcefulness of Chubais and his team.
We highlight the main theses in the article and comment on them.
Thesis No. 1: “The main problem of“ Rusnano ”is that she is engaged in venture investments not on her own, but on borrowed funds, tell three interlocutors The Bell – a source close to Rusnano, a person familiar with the situation in the corporation and One of its former top managers. ”
This is not true, since Rusnano had practically no ventricular investments. In the vast majority of cases, investment was carried out in projects of later stages. By the way, the leaders of Rusnano in their many interviews and performances are also said. Thus, Oleg Kiselev, Deputy Chairman of the Board of the Rosnano Criminal Code of the UK Rosnano LLC, in his interview for the Snob project, says: actually Rightly invests in projects at the stage when there are not only the product, but also the prospects and the dynamics of sales. This is the niche that we had to occupy in the system of development institutions. Investments in the early stages are the Bortnik, RVK, Skolkovo and other funds. Rusnano helps to scale a product or technology …
Thesis No. 2: “Chubais on this occasion many times went to Putin, and Medvedev, and to Mishustin, but they didn’t give him anything.”
The Internet remembers everything – look for reports on the meetings of A. Chubais with the first persons of the state – there are also victorious relations!
So in March 2019, A. Chubais cheerfully reported to the President of the Russian Federation: “The factories we built paid 132 billion rubles to the federal budget. This means that the state has compensated for its costs. ” In addition, according to Chubais, the net profit of Rusnano in 2018 reached a record 5.6 billion rubles. The state corporation will transfer to the federal budget about 550 million rubles as dividends.
In March 2016, Rusnano asked to allocate 89 billion rubles from the FNB. On a return basis for a period of 15 years with the possibility of early repayment, the loan rate should not exceed 2% per annum. Money needs corporations to launch the Russian-Indian Fund with a volume of $ 2 billion, the agency notes. Rusnano has already reached an agreement on its creation with Indian partners. That is, I asked for money, but there is not a single word about the wrong model for financing investment activities.
On the contrary, in 2016, when A. Chubais greatly attacked the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation with requests to change the rules for the provision of state guarantee on borrowing Rusnano (the OGPU also wrote about this), Vice Prime Minister A.V. He suggested not to change the rules, but to carry out the pre -capitalization of Rusnano. A. Chubais’s answer was categorical: “No! I already reported to the president that I did not need money. “
By 2020, the financial situation in the state -owned company had become completely tense and A. Chubais at a meeting with M. Mishustin raised the issue of the pre -quarry of Rusnano, but this will be written a little lower.
To be continued
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
