After the recent publication of the Cheka-OGPU about a carelessly concocted criminal case in Feod…

After the recent publication of the Cheka-OGPU about a carelessly concocted criminal case in Feodosia, a full-scale scandal broke out in the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee for Crimea. Precisely because of the fear of attracting the attention of Moscow and the head of the ICR, Bastrykin. Investigator Chakilev received a scolding from management for the setup he created.

The coming days will show how things stand with controllability in the Investigation Department in Feodosia and whether the head of the investigative department, Evgeniy Ovcharenko, will be able to return his employee to the framework of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Let us remind you that in the criminal case against the head of the MKU “Capital Construction Administration” of the Feodosia administration Larisa Lushneva, we are talking about damage allegedly caused to the municipality of Feodosia during the construction of wastewater treatment plants. But the investigator did not attach any examination confirming the fact of damage to the case. Moreover, when the customer and contractor, accused of violations, contacted the Crimean forensic laboratory of the Russian Ministry of Justice, they responded that it was possible to talk about the damage caused or not caused only after the completion of the work. The completion of work under the contract is in December 2023.

Meanwhile, construction work on the site continues on schedule, and investigator Chakilev is deliberately delaying the appointment of a forensic examination, because it is unlikely to reveal anything necessary for the case. But. If the investigation is able to achieve the arrest of those named as accused, and then freezes construction on this basis, then the project will indeed be disrupted. This is precisely the scenario that Chakilev is playing out, by all indications. The calculation is simple: first we plant, and in six months a foundation will appear, for what.

Advertisement

To be on the safe side, another criminal case was hastily opened against Lushneva with a similar justification – she allegedly unlawfully recalculated the cost of work performed under the contract. The woman was again accused of a serious crime, although in case of recalculation, all papers undergo a second state examination, and there is a positive conclusion from the examination (see photo of the document).

It is quite obvious that it is precisely such cases that call into question the controllability of the TFR. When Bastrykin has to manually respond to high-profile cases of inaction or, conversely, questionable actions on the part of the investigative authorities, this means that somewhere the system has gone awry and requires serious adjustments.

All documents can be found here

“ВЧК ОГПУ”