After an almost two -month break, the Presnensky District Court of Moscow continued RAS …

After an almost two-month break, the Presnensky District Court of Moscow continued to consider the case of the Militian Colonel Dmitry Zakharchenko, who, as the investigation believes, received billions of bribes for patronage from the largest Russian Railways contractors. The last meeting as part of the consideration of this case took place on October 13 and was subsequently transferred. Among the journalists and lawyers who followed all this time there were rumors that the process was deliberately delayed by the prosecution, which in the last meeting had finished exposing its arguments, not too successfully, as previously already wrote to the Cheka-OGPU
.
At today’s meeting, representatives of the defense began to state their arguments. But the very first request filed by lawyers was not satisfied. The defender of Vasily Critin, who, according to the prosecution, was a confidant of Zakharchenko, proposed to study the “base”, where, according to investigators, the “black” accounting was conducted, but Judge Artyomov postponed this process until the technical opportunity for this will be a technical opportunity “.

When the lawyers presented several weighty folders with certificates, extracts, agreements, Judge Artemov proposed to be by only the presentation of their general content, without going into details. “We will save the time of the court and announce only the main points,” agreed the lawyer Valery Markelov Alexander Gofstein, “however, I ask you to take into account that the accusation has so arbitrarily brought the facts that we had to partially take on the burden of proof, usually the defense of unusual.”

The documents submitted by the defenders showed that the former co -owner of the 1520 Group of Companies Valery Markelov was not related to almost any of the companies that appear in the materials of the investigation. Where the intersections were still located, it turned out that the state prosecutors did not take into account the dates of possession.

Advertisement

For example, at the previous meetings, the prosecutor Milan Digaeva very emotionally paid the attention of the court that Zakharchenko was so closely connected with Markelov that the latter even arranged his father to work in one of his companies – Roszheldorproekt. When it came to the details, it turned out that Markelov entered the leadership of Roszheldorproekt only in 2014, while Father Zakharchenko finished working there three years before.

In addition, with a detailed consideration of materials used by the charge, dozens of errors in the TIN of the legal entities, their names, and legal forms were revealed. The defense also separately drew the attention of the court that the FSB operational materials, which were repeatedly referred to, are not confirmed by real investigative actions and contain a lot of assumptions that are not based on any facts.

It is noteworthy that Milan Digaeva perceived all this information impassive.

The court appointed the next meeting on December 22. VChK-OGP