As Kondrat said, Makhalkina was caught red-handed while receiving a bribe from Goloshumova (she allegedly took the money for an apartment), whose case for recovery of losses amounting to 2.2 billion was being processed by Kondrat. Further, the special services, having gained control over Makhalkina, forced her to accuse Kondrat of mediating a bribe, allegedly she offered her 50 thousand dollars so that Makhalkina would refuse to satisfy the claim on her pending bankruptcy claim, which, in general, , in the end I did. In fact, Makhalkina simply wanted to evade responsibility in the case of receiving a bribe from Goloshumova and entered into an agreement with Novikov, who had intentions to punish Kondrat for not hushing up the case, but returning the withdrawn 26 billion rubles to the country.
As a result, Kondrat was forced to prove her innocence in this intricate fraudulent and illegal scheme; moreover, to put pressure on her son, a murder case was opened, and despite the lack of any evidence and numerous discrepancies and inconsistencies in the testimony of one single person , on whose words the case was “stitched together,” Nikolai Kondrat has been in custody for a year in violation of all legal norms.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
