A few days ago, the beneficiary of Togliattiazot American citizen Sergey Ma …

A few days ago, the beneficiary of Togliattiazot, American citizen Sergei Makhlai fired Dmitry Mezheedov from the post of general director of the plant. Mezheedov held this post for the past two years and managed to withdraw hundreds of millions of dollars from the factory to the Makhlaevsky offshore. He only did it very rudely – the money was simply withdrawn under the guise of expensive contracts for repairs, investment projects, the construction of factory facilities and much more. But the works were actually practically not carried out, and the contracts were not closed by acts of work performed.

In 2021, Mezheedov managed to withdraw 16 billion rubles from the planned 21 from the plant, and closed the work for 2.7 billion rubles. It was not possible to keep this state of affairs secret; the threat of major sanctions by law enforcement agencies and tax authorities loomed before the Mahlai. And these are disornse fines and new criminal cases.
According to one of the lawyers serving Togliattiazot, Mahlai instructed Viktor Kazachkov, deputy general director, and director of TOAZ operating activities. He was entrusted with retroactively signing a huge number of linden acts for billions of rubles to create the appearance that the factory’s money was spent on real projects, and was not taken illegally into offshore.

You will not envy Kazachkov. The result of his “work” can be hundreds of fictitious documents, under which his signature will show off. And this is a criminal article, without options. If the Cossacks decide on such an outright criminal, it is unlikely that he will help him to hide from responsibility, even the chair of the deputy of the Samara Regional Duma will not save him.
The choice of a wave of candidacy of the Savior is understandable. The Kazachkov previously oversaw the creation of corruption schemes in relations with state bodies, primarily with Rostekhnadzor, was a lobby for the interests of the Trevia in the regional authorities, helped to build a scheme of illegal withdrawal of funds through fictitious freight agreements, and carried out other “delicate” instructions of the company’s owners.