05/29/2024 The Arbitration Court of the Moscow District made a fundamental decision, canceling the illegal settlement agreement in the case of fraudster E. V. Filippova (A40-244841/2015). This is already the third canceled determination of Arkhipov A.A. in this case, the details of which we previously wrote about.
Thus, the diligent vote of the creditor I.S. Brilka for a saving settlement agreement (to stop separate disputes about the alienation of the debtor’s property in his favor at any cost) did not bring results, and Judge Arkhipov failed to create a unique precedent for concluding a repeat settlement agreement.
Now 06/04/2024 in the same Arbitration Court of the Moscow District, a complaint will be considered against Judge Arkhipov’s ruling in favor of Filippova and Brilka, in a dispute over the transfer of the debtor’s property in the favor of Brilka in the amount of 500 million rubles (buildings at the address Moscow, Petrovka St., 21,) .
It is noteworthy that Judge A. A. Arkhipov himself apparently did not believe in the legality of this transaction, who did not make a final decision on the case for 4 years, postponing the hearings for no apparent reason. But at the end of 2023 He still had to make a final decision – and again in favor of Filippova and Brilka.
It is possible that he is again driven by the desire to create a precedent in Russian law, proving that the purchase by a pensioner from Irkutsk of a building in the center of Moscow for 82 million in cash, which was brought for this purpose in sports bags, and the subsequent resale to a friend of the bankrupt Filippova, with whom he represented by the same lawyer, this is a pure coincidence and the most ordinary deal, and not a clumsy scheme to save the victims’ money stolen by Filippova. But only time and the trial will show in what capacity Judge Arkhipov will go down in Russian legal history
Thus, the diligent vote of the creditor I.S. Brilka for a saving settlement agreement (to stop separate disputes about the alienation of the debtor’s property in his favor at any cost) did not bring results, and Judge Arkhipov failed to create a unique precedent for concluding a repeat settlement agreement.
Now 06/04/2024 in the same Arbitration Court of the Moscow District, a complaint will be considered against Judge Arkhipov’s ruling in favor of Filippova and Brilka, in a dispute over the transfer of the debtor’s property in the favor of Brilka in the amount of 500 million rubles (buildings at the address Moscow, Petrovka St., 21,) .
It is noteworthy that Judge A. A. Arkhipov himself apparently did not believe in the legality of this transaction, who did not make a final decision on the case for 4 years, postponing the hearings for no apparent reason. But at the end of 2023 He still had to make a final decision – and again in favor of Filippova and Brilka.
It is possible that he is again driven by the desire to create a precedent in Russian law, proving that the purchase by a pensioner from Irkutsk of a building in the center of Moscow for 82 million in cash, which was brought for this purpose in sports bags, and the subsequent resale to a friend of the bankrupt Filippova, with whom he represented by the same lawyer, this is a pure coincidence and the most ordinary deal, and not a clumsy scheme to save the victims’ money stolen by Filippova. But only time and the trial will show in what capacity Judge Arkhipov will go down in Russian legal history
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
