The factor of the interest of the leadership of the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Internal Affairs and School of CAO manifested itself from the very beginning. The already well -known investigator of the SU, the Lieutenant of Justice, Maria Slezkin, with the support of the opera of the Central Administrative District of Moscow, Alexander Barylchenko, bowed the accused to give false testimonies to Tuzov. And from the Fisherman Magnata, 150 million rubles and the direct leaders of Slekina were at that moment the head of the SUS Polkolnikov, Lieutenant Colonel of Justice, with the very supporters. Andrey Dobrodomov and his deputy. – Head of the Department for the Investigation of Particularly important cases of the SU in the Central Administrative District, Major of Justice Sergey Abramov.
When the FSB Office of the FSB connected to the case, at the statement of Tuzov, Silovkina quickly quit from the Investigative Committee and disappeared abroad. From there, she began to complain to reporters that she was substituted by the leadership, which forced her to fabricate evidence and extort money from the businessman. Dobrodomov and Abramov, in turn, did everything that the “extreme” would turn out to be Silovkin. The late results of the official audit, the materials of which we publish, showed that the bosses are guilty and fabricated, but to attract them late – six months from the date of the misconduct. I wonder if the head of the second department for the investigation of particularly important cases of the IC in Moscow Ilgar Aliyev knew about how his subordinates knock out bribes?
Our sources claim that Abramov not only maintains contact with Slovkin and helps her financially, but also promises to help return if the sentence stands in the Moscow City Court.
Everyone who read the case is sure that he cannot resist and are surprised; how could the prosecutor’s office approve such an indictment? But the obvious absurdity in the case file did not prevent the judge of the Basmanny Court Evgenia Nikolaeva, in fact, according to the order of the UK, to recognize Tuzov guilty, guided by how she declared “internal self -awareness”.
By the way, it is reliably known that, being in the deliberation room, Nikolaev made two decisions on other cases. According to the law, this is a gross violation that entails an automatic announcement of the sentence.
Tuzov’s case makes us doubt the need for institutions such as supervision and proceedings. The question arises, why do they actually need if everyone is ready to blindly support the position of the greedy investigator?
VChK-OGPU
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
