He testified to the FBI staff at the embassy in Moscow. As a result, he handed over a whole group of hackers, who, along with him, who was surrendered by an employee of the QIB FSB of Russia Dokuchaev, became the main persons in the US sanctions policy for crypto gallocrates.
If you read the testimony of Kislitsyn, you will see fairly simple facts: all the persons that he passed, including Dokuchaev, were his accomplices (from his words) in cyber-pretense, for which he received the case in the United States and why everyone and why everyone and why all “Rented”, long before his work in Group-Ib. Kislitsyn did not work in the FSB. As in the GRU. He did not possess any “military” secret. The action without any speculation is immoral, but whose state. Did he give the secret? Did he disclose, in any case, in these testimonies, the information that became known to him in Group-Ib, which, for example, Group-Ib, would receive from the FSB or the Ministry of Internal Affairs? He handed over his “accomplices” to the FBI. Friends of the old ones. Who knew and with whom he allegedly “criminally” for many years before going to work in Group IB. This is if we proceed from the fact that the data given to them, generally speaking, is true – judging by their publication in the United States, it is rather no than yes. To think out that this action was a treason is to argue that Russia at least protects data on these persons. This would be a dangerous error that even the United States does not go to publicly.
And of course, the first in this case would be arrested by Kislitsin himself, and only then Sachkov. For that matter, the faithful action under the law would be the arrest of Moscow Kislitsin for cyber-crime on the basis of these data, and not Gosizman Sachkov.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
