The Cheka-OGPU continues to talk about the criminal case against Sirin Badrutdino…

The Cheka-OGPU continues to talk about the criminal case against Sirin Badrutdinov, an entrepreneur from Tatarstan and a former business partner of Senator Dmitry Savelyev. The criminal case against Badrutdinov, currently being processed by the Main Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of Russia, was initiated by Savelyev with the aim of shifting responsibility for the bankruptcy of the construction companies Spetsstroyservis LLC and Uralstroyneft LLC, which they owned, to Badrutdinov. However, this was not the end of Savelyev’s ingenuity in the matter of avoiding personal property liability. Having become the actual owner of a 70% stake in Spetsstroyservis LLC and Uralstroyneft LLC at the end of 2017, Dmitry Savelyev removed Badrutdinov from management, putting his team of loyal managers in charge of the enterprises. After this, in 2019-2020. Between the enterprises controlled by Savelyev (Spetsstroyservis LLC and Uralstroyneft LLC) and PJSC AK BARS Bank, agreements were concluded to open a guarantee line and loan agreements to provide a credit line for a total amount of more than 2 billion rubles. Along with Badrutdinov, Dmitry Savelyev himself acted as a guarantor of the companies to the Bank, having signed the corresponding guarantee agreements. Further, as a result of the management of the enterprises by the senator’s team, their financial performance began to deteriorate sharply. So, according to the database rusprofile.ruif at the end of 2017 the revenue of Spetsstroyservice LLC and Uralstroyneft LLC was 16 billion rubles. and 8.2 billion rubles. accordingly, in 2020 it fell to 3.4 billion and 3 billion rubles). As a result, both companies were brought to bankruptcy, which naturally led to the impossibility of repaying debts to PJSC AK BARS Bank. The total debt of companies to the Bank amounted to 1.1 billion rubles. In 2021, the Bank, as expected, filed a claim with the Leninogorsk City Court of the Republic of Tatarstan against Savelyev and Badrutdinov as guarantors of the companies to collect the said debt (cases No. 2-988/2021; No. 2-1029/2021; No. 2-976/2021). This is where the senator’s ingenuity showed itself again. To begin with, his wife Olga Savelyeva filed claims in the Odintsovo City Court of the Moscow Region to recognize the surety agreements concluded by Savelyev with the Bank as invalid, citing the lack of her consent, as a spouse, to carry out transactions. The senator himself stated in court through his representatives that he did not know about the existence of these surety agreements and did not bind himself to any obligations to the Bank in relation to relations with these enterprises. According to the source of the Cheka-OGPU, at the same time, the Investigative Committee registered Savelyev’s statement about the falsification of his signatures in the specified surety agreements with PJSC AK BARS Bank in the interests of Spetsstroyservis LLC and Uralstroyneft LLC. This position of Savelyev causes obvious bewilderment, given that without guarantee agreements with the owners of the companies, obtaining loans and bank guarantees was impossible. In addition, decisions on concluding surety agreements were made at meetings of participants in both companies by all members of the Board of Directors, formed by Savelyev from his proxies, including Irina Kudryashova, who was the head of Realty Center LLC, through which Savelyev owned 70% of the shares in both companies. It is obvious that under these circumstances, Savelyev’s statements about the falsification of his signatures in contracts are another attempt to mislead the judicial and investigative authorities in order to rid himself of his financial obligations. At the same time, with an unbiased attitude and taking into account the available evidence, it should not be difficult for law enforcement agencies to establish the unreliability of Savelyev’s statements.
https://t.me/vchkogpu/31378?single