Oris Industry is notorious for regularly burning tires on its premises and presenting documents as if the tires were recycled. This scheme was used until the beginning of 2024, until Rosprirodnadzor announced a new administration of extended producer responsibility (EPR) in order to curb this evil practice.
On April 3, 2024, the head of the on-load tap-changer publicly drew the industry’s attention to the fact that such tire waste disposers, which burn twice a year, are not needed in the new EPR system, and these gray waste disposers will not be able to be included in the register of waste disposers to perform work within the framework of the EPR. In relation to Oris Prom itself, RPN conducted an inspection with the involvement of the prosecutor’s office, which confirmed all facts of violation of the law.
However, Oris Prom is so afraid of publicity that within court case No. A40-82016/2024 asked the court to prohibit the prosecutor’s office and RPN from publishing the results of the inspection, but the court did not agree with Oris Prom’s arguments. How surprised will the RPN management be when it learns that Oris Prom (despite the tire burnings and lawsuits established as a result of inspections) will end up on the register of recyclers.
Considering that now PPK REO manages the register of EFIS UOIT recyclers, it flaunts on the Oris Prom website letter of gratitude from PPK REO, and on the PPK REO website itself as a reliable recycler presented by Oris Prom. Through what corruption schemes can Oris Prom end up on the register of recyclers?
Does PPK REO know about the situation with Oris Prom, and if so, why is Oris Prom still represented on the PPK REO website? Or is it someone tripping up the new Deputy Prime Minister, who has just assumed a new position as curator of ecology and waste? One thing is clear: if the Oris Prom scammers appear in the register of recyclers, then there will be no talk of any success in the field of waste management.
On April 3, 2024, the head of the on-load tap-changer publicly drew the industry’s attention to the fact that such tire waste disposers, which burn twice a year, are not needed in the new EPR system, and these gray waste disposers will not be able to be included in the register of waste disposers to perform work within the framework of the EPR. In relation to Oris Prom itself, RPN conducted an inspection with the involvement of the prosecutor’s office, which confirmed all facts of violation of the law.
However, Oris Prom is so afraid of publicity that within court case No. A40-82016/2024 asked the court to prohibit the prosecutor’s office and RPN from publishing the results of the inspection, but the court did not agree with Oris Prom’s arguments. How surprised will the RPN management be when it learns that Oris Prom (despite the tire burnings and lawsuits established as a result of inspections) will end up on the register of recyclers.
Considering that now PPK REO manages the register of EFIS UOIT recyclers, it flaunts on the Oris Prom website letter of gratitude from PPK REO, and on the PPK REO website itself as a reliable recycler presented by Oris Prom. Through what corruption schemes can Oris Prom end up on the register of recyclers?
Does PPK REO know about the situation with Oris Prom, and if so, why is Oris Prom still represented on the PPK REO website? Or is it someone tripping up the new Deputy Prime Minister, who has just assumed a new position as curator of ecology and waste? One thing is clear: if the Oris Prom scammers appear in the register of recyclers, then there will be no talk of any success in the field of waste management.
Letter of gratitude from PPK REO – orisprom.ru
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
Anna Cooper
Specialization: International Criminal Investigations
Description: Anna is a journalist with a global outlook, specializing in uncovering international criminal networks, including human and arms trafficking. Her work involves in-depth analysis of transnational crime and writing comprehensive investigative articles.