In the “Matrosskaya Tishina” pre-trial detention center, co-owner of WEX (BTC-E) Bilyuchenko (Ivanov) refused…

In the “Matrosskaya Tishina” pre-trial detention center, the co-owner of WEX (BTC-E) Bilyuchenko (Ivanov) refused lawyers, and the opera and investigators forced him to take a “defender” Yulia Nazarova, who was an employee of Alfa-SB LLC, controlled by the Kremlin oligarch Konstantin Malofeev . Yulia Aleksandrovna Nazarova was an employee of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs for the city of Yoshkar-Ola for a long time, where she rose to the rank of deputy chief of inquiry. In 2020, she was recruited and employed by the AT-CONSULTING holding, and later by Alfa-SB LLC (Malofeeev’s structures) where she worked with Volkov (former high-ranking FSB and FSO officer), Izotov (former employee of the FSB Directorate for the Republic of Mari- El), Ekimovsky (former employee of Department “M” of the FSB Directorate for the Republic of Mari-El), Mozgunov (a friend of Ibraev) and Ibraev (former employee of Department “M” of the FSB, with whom Nazarova lived in the same village of Novotaryalovsky as a child).

Nazarova helped Bilyuchenko transfer 10,000 BTC directly from the pre-trial detention center to the specified wallet addresses provided to him by members of Malofeev’s criminal gang. In addition, Ivanov issued a power of attorney to Nazarova for the management and disposal of bank accounts. Bilyuchenko (Ivanov) also began to testify under Nazarova’s dictation.

According to Ivanov’s official testimony, he allegedly transferred, during the period from January 2019 to August 2021, cryptocurrency equivalent to 4,933,435,871 rubles (at the rates at the time of the transfers) to the head of the 3rd department of the 4th department of the Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Georgy Satyukov, and his friend Sokolov, which, in his firm conviction, was the subject of a bribe. For what exact actions such a significant amount was transferred, Ivanov found it difficult to say; later, according to the investigation, the reason will be stated as “general patronage.” Ivanov also found it difficult to tell who exactly, Satyukov or Sokolov, the cryptocurrency was transferred, and therefore repeatedly changed his testimony.

Advertisement

According to Ivanov, he does not remember the amount of part of the cryptocurrency transfers, as well as the addresses of the wallets, the dates and circumstances of the transfers, he does not have access to the wallets from which the transfers were made, however, he is absolutely sure that it was a bribe and names the exact amounts in dollar equivalent for moment of transfer.

https://rucriminal.info/ru/material/10-000-btc-iz-kamery-matrosskoy-tishiny