The release of Shakro from the colony aroused too much interest among journalists. On all issues related to Kalashov, the FSIN acted under the full leadership of the FSB of the Russian Federation. As a result, journalists were given information that Kalashov was no longer in the penal colony in Ust-Labinsk, but that he had been transported to Moscow in advance, where his release would take place. In reality, in the early morning of March 29, thief in law No. 1 left the walls of the penal colony and, accompanied by his closest people, went to his cottage on Rublyovka.
Kalashov was unable to rest. Already on March 29, late in the evening, “authorities” Martin Babakekhyan and Alexander Zakharov (Sandro), as well as lawyer Badri Koguashvili (Badri Kutaissky), arrived at his cottage. Until the morning there was a discussion of “urgent” matters in the criminal world. And here Shakro has many difficult questions.
One of the main ones is who will act as an intermediary between many mafiosi who have “petitions” against Kalashov. He himself will limit his social circle to a minimum. Badri seems to be the main contender for the role of such an intermediary, but there are many problems here. During Shakro’s long imprisonment, Koguashvili served as thief in law No. 1, but was unable to receive even close to the respect in the mafia world that Shakro had. Here are Badri’s undisguised commercial activities, constant communication with the illiterate Rufo, and, most importantly, close interaction with the security forces. If Badri also takes on the role of a mediator, then his status could be completely undermined. Kalashov is known for his personal opinion on any issue, regardless of who brought the “topic” and how much money is behind it. Therefore, Badri, as a mediator, may too often hear “no” from Shakro, which will completely undermine his reputation. Most likely, Dato will act as an intermediary.
As for the main thieves’ conflict of recent decades – between Taro and Lasha – which took the lives of Ded Khasan, Yaponchik and a number of other thieves, there is no longer any reason to postpone its decision. Both Taro and Lasha are free. Shakro’s position is well known: all thieves in law who have no blood on their hands should receive a massive “expense.” And here the main question is whether someone can openly blame Taro and Merab Dzhangveladze for the elimination of Ded Hasan and Yaponchik. “Investigation versions” are one thing. And another thing is “thieves’ evidence.” And objectively, Taro and Merab have nothing to show. According to Tarot, the question of his “non-thief behavior” will again be raised, but Oniani “cleans up his tails” in advance. Thus, even before Shakro’s release, thieves in law close to Taro in Poland beat up thief in law Varlam Kukhianidze (Vatia), who had previously beaten Taro himself. Now no one will claim that Oniani did not answer for his beating.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”