Part 1
A source from the Cheka-OGPU reports that when analyzing versions of the crash of Yevgeny Prigozhin’s plane, experts compare three cases of aviation emergencies. We are talking about the emergency landing of the Tu-154 in Izhma in 2010, the crash of the AN-148 in the Belgorod region in 2011 and the crash of the A321 over the Sinai Peninsula in 2015.
The first example, where everyone survived, perfectly shows that even if all the jet’s electronics had failed (a fantastic version with a signal “jammer” for the head of the PMC on board), there was a solution. The interlocutor is sure that the most experienced PIC Alexey Levshin would not have allowed the car to go into a tailspin, even if all the systems (which, by the way, have several levels of safety net) had failed. To land a plane, the ace needs a “horizon” and a tachometer with a speedometer, which can work without a power source.
The second example illustrates the version most desired by officials at the moment. The cause of the AN-148 crash was said to be excessive speed due to “lack of proper coordination between crew members.” It was reported that a pilot from Myanmar was at one of the controls, and his instructor partner was constantly distracted by conversations. Another parallel with this emergency is that the AN-148 began to fall apart in the air from overload, in particular, the wing of the aircraft came off. Here, in favor of the crew of Evgeniy Prigozhin’s Embraer is the height. At a flight level of 8.5 kilometers, the pilots would have had enough time to level the car when the AN-148 fell into a tailspin almost above the ground.
To be continued
“ВЧК ОГПУ”